Info

Mind Over Money

The psychology of investing has become such an important area of research that major hedge funds are building trading strategies around human behavioral patterns. In Mind Over Money, Kevin Cook explores the crossroads where markets and brains collide, delving into the two sciences – neuroscience and behavioral finance – that show why investors are often highly irrational when faced with economic decisions, uncertainty, and risk.
RSS Feed
Mind Over Money
2023
March
January


2022
June
May
February


2021
September
August
July
April
February


2020
December
October
September
June
April
March
February
January


2019
December
November
September
August


2018
July
June
May
January


2017
December
November
October
September
August
June
May
March
February
January


2016
December
November
October


Categories

All Episodes
Archives
Categories
Now displaying: January, 2017
Jan 26, 2017

Welcome back to Mind Over Money. I’m Kevin Cook, your field guide and story teller for the fascinating arena of Behavioral Economics.

 

Today my guest is a trading coach who once worked in the field of “threat assessment” where he dealt with bank robbers, hostage negotiations and bomb threats.

 

Now psychologist Andrew Menaker focuses on a pragmatic model to help traders create self-awareness, positive behavior change, and ultimately success in their chosen vocation.

 

And I'm really excited to talk to him because he gives powerful depth and breadth to areas of trading psychology that I have long known were extremely important but never thought could be formulated into repeatable cognitive strategies that could help so many different types of traders.

 

Before we meet Dr. Menaker, I want to share a short blog he posted on LinkedIn back in October. This excerpt will set up our conversation well...

 

Trading Psychology That Works!

 

You know those lists of personality traits or characteristics of ‘good traders’ – what happens after you read them? Do you get excited? Do you become hopeful? Do you become worried that maybe you don't have the right stuff? Moreover, will reading about it make you a better trader?

 

That’s the big question, right? Does reading that stuff help you become a better trader? For the vast majority, my bet is that it doesn’t help at all! In fact, for most traders it triggers a very personal and particular sense of worry….I don't have the right stuff….Will I ever have the right stuff? How do I get the right stuff?

 

Then along comes an ad, a tweet, a webinar, or blog piece that promises to show you the path. Hypnotic suggestions, meditation, affirmations, positive thinking, NLP, Tapping, ‘brain balancing’...etc. I threw in ‘brain balancing’ because I recently spoke to a trader who was very angry, telling me, “I wasted money on brain balancing.”

 

The list of things promising to make you a better trader seems almost endless.

 

Most of the people selling you that stuff are not that different from the people selling you the ‘trading edge that works’. I like to refer to them as dream merchants. They are selling you a dream, not reality.

 

(you can read the full blog here or listen to the podcast and hear me read the whole thing to you!)

 

The Most Important Market in the World

 

Be sure to listen to my 20-minute conversation with Dr. Menaker where he tells how he went from the "threat assessment" business to helping traders uncover their own threats to their capital -- and their mental and physical health.

 

His analysis of the trading psychology game is original, practical, and based on his own experience as an S&P Emini futures day trader. He teaches traders to not just become aware of their emotions but how to use them as a rich source of information about their trading and decision-making.

 

But he warns that it takes "psychological courage" to do the work of analyzing and understanding the most important market you trade -- your "inner market" of thoughts, beliefs, perceptions, and neurological habits.

 

Dr. Menaker and I strongly agree that trading is actually a great way to discover yourself if you are willing to do that work.

 

If you're not into that, at least he provides a framework and a pathway to becoming the trader you always wanted to. Check out today's podcast to learn more about his ideas and work.

 

And thanks for following Mind Over Money. If you have questions, comments, or suggestions for future topics, please email us at podcast@Zacks.com

 

Plus, don't hesitate to be generous with compliments! Let my boss know you want Mind Over Money to keep exposing the psychology of investing!

Jan 17, 2017

The Evolution of Risk-Taking

 

Trading is one of the hardest day jobs in the world – what drives those who succeed at it?

 

Welcome back to Mind Over Money, I’m Kevin Cook, your field guide and story teller for the fascinating arena of behavioral economics.

 

Today my guest is a PhD candidate from the University of Greenwich in London who is studying the risk-taking behavior of traders from the perspective of evolutionary psychology.

 

Belinda Vigors wants to know if successful traders are doing anything different when making decisions under uncertainty and stress than us mere mortals who wrestle with our cognitive biases and unknown depths of neurochemistry and neuro-circuitry that drive our emotional habits.

 

Before we meet Belinda, I want to give you some background for our discussion that is actually causing a rift in the field of behavioral economics, at least for those of us who apply it to markets and trading.

 

I have been a long-time fan of Daniel Kahneman -- who is the only psychologist ever to win a Nobel Prize -- for his work on decision making under uncertainty and risk. He practically invented the discipline of behavioral finance.

 

And the cognitive biases that he has discovered and named over 4 decades have given us a rich vocabulary with which to talk about people (and traders) acting stupid and irrational with money and risk.

 

Since I am also an eager student of neuroscience, I simply look at the two fields as different but complementary ways of describing and understanding decision making. As I like to say, the behavioral gang studies us from the OUTSIDE-IN, while the brain gang studies us from the INSIDE-OUT.

 

An Affinity for Randomness and Ambiguity

 

But Kahneman’s 2011 book Thinking Fast and Slow has caused some extra controversy in the twilight of his long career because he may be not only oversimplifying how our decision making works, but also limiting any believer’s choice of solutions or therapies.

 

In other words, his System #1 and System #2 for thinking -- the fast and emotional vs. the slow and rational, respectively -- don't appear to integrate with the findings of brain science very well, which would argue for much more complexity especially as emotion and neurochemistry are concerned.

 

Kahneman also no longer likes describing humans as “irrational.” But then how do we explain all sorts of self-sabotage regarding money, risk and long-term goals? Or, how about truly self-destructive behavior like crime and violence?

 

And Kahneman’s theories are not based on any clinical work in helping people or traders change their thinking and decision-making. Since I did not read Thinking Fast and Slow, in today’s podcast I share a quick review by a thoughtful investor who explains quite well why the theories may be very limiting.

 

Ravee Mehta, a portfolio manager and author of The Emotionally Intelligent Investor: How Self-Awareness, Empathy and Intuition Drive Performance, says that Kahneman’s systems miss much of the significant skill, discipline, and what I call an “affinity for randomness” that traders can develop when they become more aware of their emotions and intuition.

 

Here’s an excerpt from Mehta’s 2012 blog, “Daniel Kahneman is Wrong (at least when it comes to investing)”...

 

I humbly disagree with Kahneman, a Nobel laureate, and some other prominent psychologists when it comes to “fast-thinking” and investing. They argue that the stock market is too complex and random for intuition to be developed. They believe that the randomness causes people to build incorrect association biases. This argument is flawed.  While the overall market may seem complex and random, there are many patterns within it that recur frequently. The best money managers recognize patterns developing ahead of most. They also can develop useful intuition because they are honest with themselves about the role luck had in their success.  The intuitive decision-making that is involved with investing is much more complicated than other types of decision-making. However, that does not mean that we should abandon trying to better develop and use gut instincts when we invest.

 

The Evolutionary Path of Trader Brains

 

Cognitive biases, emotional habits, and intuition are definitely interesting. But what really gets me excited is talking about how our brains work. And that invariably leads to discussions about our evolution.

 

So I was really excited to bring in a young student of this complex collision between behavioral science and of one of the hardest jobs on the planet, trading.

 

Belinda Vigors explains how traders may be dealing with risk in terms of “need thresholds” and survival goals. She bases part of her theories about emotion on the work of psychologist Jennifer Lerner of Harvard whose research examines the distinct effects of fear, anger, and happiness on risk perception and risk preference.

 

Be sure to listen to the podcast to hear my full conversation with Belinda.

 

Kevin Cook is a Senior Stock Strategist at Zacks Investment Research where he runs the TAZR trading service.

1